Stop! In the name of light…

The topic I want to cover in this post is something rather “basic” – but I remember how it kept me puzzled for quite a while when I got more serious about photography, in 2007. And when I finally understood what it’s all about I was like “duh!” – it helped me so much to handle my camera better, faster, and with more confidence. So I try to give an explanation in really really simple words – and hope it works. πŸ™‚

I can’t remember how many times I’ve read and heard about “fast” lenses, about “stopping down”, about “one stop” more (or less) light, “one more stop” of usable ISO, and so on, and so on (and in German, instead of “stop” people usually say “Blende” – aperture – and it puzzled me just the same). I wondered: what the hell IS a “stop” actually?

The simple answer: a change of one stop (increase or decrease, no matter how, I’ll explain it right below) means that we allow either double or halve the amount of light to work for us. Double the amount if the exposure time gets longer, and half the amount if the exposure time gets shorter.

I myself understood the idea best when I looked at the “full” aperture progression, because the aperture is (more or less) “in the way” of the light as it passes through the lens, onto the sensor or film. It’s not so much in the way if it is wide open and lets a lot of light pass through, and it’s very much in the way if we “stop down” a lot, so that the opening through which the light can pass is really really small (hint: in the Nikon world, all lenses have a small lever on the end that is mounted to the camera – it can be moved with the finger and when you do that, it’s very clear then what the aperture does. Try it.)

Now, if we start at f/2.8 (which is the common maximum aperture opening for “fast” zoom lenses), the series of apertures that follow are 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22. Those are full stops. With the aperture blades closing farther and farther from one full stop to the next, only half the amount of light can pass through to the cameras sensor (or film) for each of these so called f-stops.

So if you “stop down” the lens from f/2.8 to f/4 (yes, this is one stop) you let only half the amount of light pass through the lens, and to get a proper exposure, you have to double the exposure time – let’s say from 1/100s to 1/50s. If you stop down twice (which, starting from f/2.8, would mean you end up with an aperture setting of f/5.6) you need an exposure time that is four times as long – let’s say 1/25s instead of 1/100s.

It’s a bit of an abstraction when these “stops” are used for exposure times and sensor sensitivity, but the concept is just the same. If you’re looking at a relatively dark scene, you might want to tell your camera to underexpose “one stop”*. So you’d set 1/100s instead of 1/50s (without adjusting the aperture), letting only half the amount of light get to the sensor (or film) because the shutter is open only half as long.

And if it’s used for the sensitivity of the sensor (or film): ISO400 is one stop faster than ISO200. And ISO800 is two stops faster than ISO200. Using ISO400 instead of ISO200 means that the sensor will capture twice the amount of light** (if the exposure and aperture stay unchanged).

How did this help me when I operate my camera? Well, most cameras allow adjustments to the aperture, exposure and ISO in steps of 1/3 of a stop (most Nikons can be configured to use 1/2 stop instead, but it’s not the factory default).

So, if I make a photo and notice that it is underexposed (when I check the histogram on the camera’s display), I simply use the main command dial of my camera to dial in one stop of overexposure, and it’s 3 clicks of the dial, each 1/3 stop. Or, if I cannot use a longer exposure time, I might need to raise the ISO sensitivity by one stop: I press the “ISO” qualifier button and again it’s 3 clicks of the dial, each 1/3 of a stop. Or, if I can sacrifice the depth of field, I can open up the aperture, and again it’s 3 clicks for one full stop. I don’t have look at the actual number, I simply go click-click-click (in either direction, and for any of the three variables: exposure, aperture and ISO sensitivity) and I know I now have either halved or doubled the amount of light reaching the sensor or film.

Click-click-click. That’s one stop. It’s really that simple. I wish someone would have told me. That’s why I wrote this article. If it helps just one fellow photography fan out there, my mission is accomplished. Click-click-click.

*) why? because the camera doesn’t know you’re looking at a relatively dark scene – it always assumes you’re looking at an averagely lit scene.

**) the sensor doesn’t actually capture more light; it’s more like the signal is amplified – and sensor noise along with it.


1 Comment

  1. Good! Now I've got better neural network arrangement on stops than before πŸ™‚ But that ISO setting on 1/3 stops is cool – some could call this unnecessary, but it's logical, in symmetry with other controls. I'd need to bend that 3-click convention on ISO setting on Canon EOS D60: it's always 1 stop (100, 200, 400…) except for the “extreme” setting at ISO 1000 :p


Thoughts? Let me hear them.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s